One of the latest tools NVIDIA has announced at IFA 2026 is called Personal AI Router or PAIR, a free and open-source tool that can distribute AI workloads across local PCs. "More than half of US households have two or more PCs," NVIDIA writes in its announcement, and apparently, they mostly sit idle throughout the day. While AI agents already break complex tasks into smaller jobs that can be done at the same time, they could be competing for the same GPU anyway. In other words, more complex tasks would still take some time to finish. PAIR prevents performance slowdowns by finding PCs on a local network and then routing task requests to the system, which is currently running idle and has the capacity to accomplish them more quickly.

I wore the world's first HDR10 smart glasses TCL's new E Ink tablet beats the Remarkable and Kindle Anker's new charger is one of the most unique I've ever seen I wore the world's first HDR10 smart glasses TCL's new E Ink tablet beats the Remarkable and Kindle Anker's new charger is one of the most unique I've ever seen I used Perplexity's AI agent in Windows to tackle 5 complex tasks - here's what impressed me most No longer limited to the Mac, Perplexity's Personal Computer for Windows AI can complete complex tasks on your PC with little or no input from you. Agentic AI is designed to save you time and labor by handling complex, multi-step tasks on your computer with little or no interaction from you. Just describe the mission to your favorite AI, and it should complete the required steps all on its own. Among the companies rolling out their own agentic AIs, Perplexity has been touting its Personal Computer feature built into its desktop apps. Previously available only for the Mac, Perplexity Personal Computer recently expanded to Windows, supporting both Windows 11 and Windows 10. The only requirement is that you must subscribe to one of Perplexity's paid plans -- Pro, Max, or Enterprise.

Test-time scaling (TTS) enhances the performance of large language models (LLMs) by allocating additional compute resources during inference. However, existing research primarily investigates TTS in single-stage tasks; while many real-world problems are multi-stage complex tasks, composed of a sequence of heterogeneous subtasks with each subtask requires LLM of specific capability. Therefore, we study a novel problem: the test-time compute-optimal scaling in multi-stage complex tasks, aiming to select suitable models and allocate budgets per subtask to maximize overall performance. TTS in multi-stage tasks introduces two fundamental challenges: (i) The combinatorial search space of model and budget allocations, combined with the high cost of inference, makes brute-force search impractical.

Large-scale machine learning models deliver strong performance across a wide range of tasks but come with significant computational and resource constraints. To mitigate these challenges, local smaller models are often deployed alongside larger models, relying on routing and deferral mechanisms to offload complex tasks.

Recent advances in inference-time compute have significantly improved performance on complex tasks by generating long chains of thought (CoTs) using Large Reasoning Models (LRMs). However, this improved accuracy comes at the cost of high inference latency due to the length of generated reasoning sequences and the autoregressive nature of decoding. Our key insight in tackling these overheads is that LRM inference, and the reasoning that it embeds, is highly tolerant of approximations: complex tasks are typically broken down into simpler steps, each of which brings utility based on the semantic insight it provides for downstream steps rather than the exact tokens it generates. Accordingly, we introduce SpecReason, a system that automatically accelerates LRM inference by using a lightweight model to (speculatively) carry out simpler intermediate reasoning steps and reserving the costly base model only to efficiently assess (and potentially correct) the speculated outputs. Importantly, SpecReason's focus on exploiting the semantic flexibility of thinking tokens in preserving final-answer accuracy is complementary to prior speculation techniques, most notably speculative decoding, which demands token-level equivalence at each step. Across a variety of cross-domain reasoning benchmarks, SpecReason achieves 1.4-3.0$\times$

PCWorld explains how vague prompts produce poor results from AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini, emphasizing the need for specific, detailed requests. The article introduces prompt decomposition, a technique that breaks complex tasks into key variables to create more effective AI prompts. This method helps users guide AI tools more precisely, resulting in higher-quality, less biased outputs for complex tasks. It's never a good idea to hand ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini big, vague tasks like "draw up a business plan for my new venture" or "act as my personal assistant." Fuzzy prompts like those are sure to yield equally fuzzy results, allowing the AI to make decisions based on its training data and inherent biases, potentially leading you down a path you never intended.

Thank reviewers for the comments. Please find our responses below, with reference indices consistent with the paper . Q3-5: Meaning of the learned divergence? We agree that BC minimizes the policy KL divergence as what we noted in Sec. 4 (line 200). It is consistent with the literature, e.g., Sec. 2 in [Y u et al. arXiv:1909.09314].

Large language models (LLMs) such as T0, FLAN, and OPT-IML excel in multi-tasking under a unified instruction-following paradigm, where they also exhibit remarkable generalization abilities to unseen tasks.

We study the problem of learning control policies for complex tasks given by logical specifications. Recent approaches automatically generate a reward function from a given specification and use a suitable reinforcement learning algorithm to learn a policy that maximizes the expected reward. These approaches, however, scale poorly to complex tasks that require high-level planning. In this work, we develop a compositional learning approach, called DIRL, that interleaves high-level planning and reinforcement learning. First, DIRL encodes the specification as an abstract graph; intuitively, vertices and edges of the graph correspond to regions of the state space and simpler sub-tasks, respectively. Our approach then incorporates reinforcement learning to learn neural network policies for each edge (sub-task) within a Dijkstra-style planning algorithm to compute a high-level plan in the graph. An evaluation of the proposed approach on a set of challenging control benchmarks with continuous state and action spaces demonstrates that it outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.

Deep learning's success has led to larger and larger models to handle more and more complex tasks; trained models often contain millions of parameters. These large models are compute-and memory-intensive, which makes it a challenge to deploy them with latency, throughput, and storage constraints. Some model compression methods have been successfully applied to image classification and detection or language models, but there has been very little work compressing generative adversarial networks (GANs) performing complex tasks. In this paper, we show that a standard model compression technique, weight pruning and knowledge distillation, cannot be applied to GANs using existing methods. We then develop a self-supervised compression technique which uses the trained discriminator to supervise the training of a compressed generator. We show that this framework has compelling performance to high degrees of sparsity, can be easily applied to new tasks and models, and enables meaningful comparisons between different compression granularities.